Comments on: Environmental Policies and Computing http://www.news.software.coop/environmental-policies-and-computing/393/ What software.coop is doing and contemplating Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:10:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: MJ Ray http://www.news.software.coop/environmental-policies-and-computing/393/#comment-614 MJ Ray Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:41:06 +0000 http://www.news.software.coop/environmental-policies-and-computing/393/#comment-614 Well, it's based on the same scoring system as the last four editions. I don't feel that's useless - it's a broad-brush overview, certainly, but it's more trustworthy than the companies' own reporting. How would you do measured scientific analysis? Wouldn't the cost of preparing that be prohibitive for a non-profit group? Well, it’s based on the same scoring system as the last four editions. I don’t feel that’s useless – it’s a broad-brush overview, certainly, but it’s more trustworthy than the companies’ own reporting.

How would you do measured scientific analysis? Wouldn’t the cost of preparing that be prohibitive for a non-profit group?

]]> By: Adam Bower http://www.news.software.coop/environmental-policies-and-computing/393/#comment-613 Adam Bower Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:11:01 +0000 http://www.news.software.coop/environmental-policies-and-computing/393/#comment-613 Is the Greenpeace report still based on their subjective criteria like the previous ones which basically reduced the reports to useless hyperbole? Or have they now adopted a more sensible approach using measured scientific analysis of what the companies are actually doing and what their products are like? Is the Greenpeace report still based on their subjective criteria like the previous ones which basically reduced the reports to useless hyperbole?
Or have they now adopted a more sensible approach using measured scientific analysis of what the companies are actually doing and what their products are like?

]]>