<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LugRadio Live Event Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.news.software.coop/event-review-lugradio-live/7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.news.software.coop/event-review-lugradio-live/7/</link>
	<description>Updates seen at the co-operative for Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/event-review-lugradio-live/7/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/?p=7#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I found a transcript of the slides of a previous edition at the foot of http://www.slideshare.net/emmajane/form-an-orderly-queue-ladies/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a transcript of the slides of a previous edition at the foot of <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/emmajane/form-an-orderly-queue-ladies/">http://www.slideshare.net/emmajane/form-an-orderly-queue-ladies/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lug Radio Live UK 2008 - the Nutsack contents &#124; Software Cooperative News</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/event-review-lugradio-live/7/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Lug Radio Live UK 2008 - the Nutsack contents &#124; Software Cooperative News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/?p=7#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] conference pack for LugRadioLive was called a &#8220;nutsack&#8221; for some reason (anyone know why?). It seems like a pretty good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conference pack for LugRadioLive was called a &#8220;nutsack&#8221; for some reason (anyone know why?). It seems like a pretty good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LugRadio Live Event Review, Part Web2.0 &#124; Software Cooperative News</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/event-review-lugradio-live/7/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>LugRadio Live Event Review, Part Web2.0 &#124; Software Cooperative News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/?p=7#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] aspect I didn&#8217;t mention in the LugRadio Live Event Review was how old-fashioned it seemed in some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aspect I didn&#8217;t mention in the LugRadio Live Event Review was how old-fashioned it seemed in some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/event-review-lugradio-live/7/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/?p=7#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Was it as good as I think it was?  I wish I remembered more of it, but the visuals seemed to support your message pretty slickly.

My complaint about the womens&#039; groups isn&#039;t as much about the names (which are bad, but oh well) as about the women-only projects they launch and the multiple forms of deviousness they usually seem to involve.  For example, I linked to a past grumble about debian-women there: during that discussion, I was told my submission would appear on the survey responses page and it was just lack of time, but I don&#039;t think it ever did.  Those projects seem dishonest, trying to introduce yet more discrimination, while claiming to promote equality.

I can appreciate wanting to monitor them, though, but that&#039;s probably easier for you than me. *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it as good as I think it was?  I wish I remembered more of it, but the visuals seemed to support your message pretty slickly.</p>
<p>My complaint about the womens&#8217; groups isn&#8217;t as much about the names (which are bad, but oh well) as about the women-only projects they launch and the multiple forms of deviousness they usually seem to involve.  For example, I linked to a past grumble about debian-women there: during that discussion, I was told my submission would appear on the survey responses page and it was just lack of time, but I don&#8217;t think it ever did.  Those projects seem dishonest, trying to introduce yet more discrimination, while claiming to promote equality.</p>
<p>I can appreciate wanting to monitor them, though, but that&#8217;s probably easier for you than me. *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmajane</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/event-review-lugradio-live/7/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>emmajane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/?p=7#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you enjoyed the talk! I know, I know (re. participation in women&#039;s groups), but I do feel it&#039;s really important to keep an ear to what&#039;s happening and I think that some are doing good an interesting work (even if the names are bad).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed the talk! I know, I know (re. participation in women&#8217;s groups), but I do feel it&#8217;s really important to keep an ear to what&#8217;s happening and I think that some are doing good an interesting work (even if the names are bad).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
