<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why people do and don&#8217;t join SPI?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/</link>
	<description>What software.coop is doing and contemplating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:10:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>I believe that SPI was formed around the time the whole &quot;free software&quot;/&quot;open source&quot; naming debate was kicking off and &quot;software available to the general public&quot; was adopted as a compromise, trying to avoid splitting the community, but I wasn&#039;t a member then and didn&#039;t find the discussion archive when I just looked.

If you think it should be changed, please join and make the point to the board or the by-laws update working group when it starts (I think almost all members think some updates are needed).

I agree that more of the working information needs to be summarised and published.  My requests to update the website so far have been a dismal failure, so I guess most members don&#039;t see the problem.  More members who do see the problem would be a good thing, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that SPI was formed around the time the whole &#8220;free software&#8221;/&#8221;open source&#8221; naming debate was kicking off and &#8220;software available to the general public&#8221; was adopted as a compromise, trying to avoid splitting the community, but I wasn&#8217;t a member then and didn&#8217;t find the discussion archive when I just looked.</p>
<p>If you think it should be changed, please join and make the point to the board or the by-laws update working group when it starts (I think almost all members think some updates are needed).</p>
<p>I agree that more of the working information needs to be summarised and published.  My requests to update the website so far have been a dismal failure, so I guess most members don&#8217;t see the problem.  More members who do see the problem would be a good thing, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read the by-laws and guidelines of SPI and I agree with them, but (as an example) I can&#039;t find a single reference to &#039;Free Software&#039; on them. It always alludes to &#039;software available to the general public&#039;, which definition I can&#039;t find either. I find the available information about SPI too much generic. 
This is the main reason why I&#039;ve not become a SPI member, I know what SPI is doing, and I know it&#039;s a good job but I think the goals, motivations and procedures of SPI are not enough clearly explained or detailed. I&#039;m reluctant to join a group which theoretical fundamentals are not so clear to me. (probably my fault, I could have requested more info or something)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read the by-laws and guidelines of SPI and I agree with them, but (as an example) I can&#8217;t find a single reference to &#8216;Free Software&#8217; on them. It always alludes to &#8216;software available to the general public&#8217;, which definition I can&#8217;t find either. I find the available information about SPI too much generic.<br />
This is the main reason why I&#8217;ve not become a SPI member, I know what SPI is doing, and I know it&#8217;s a good job but I think the goals, motivations and procedures of SPI are not enough clearly explained or detailed. I&#8217;m reluctant to join a group which theoretical fundamentals are not so clear to me. (probably my fault, I could have requested more info or something)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPI Meeting Tonight and Why People Don't Join SPI &#124; Software Cooperative News</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>SPI Meeting Tonight and Why People Don't Join SPI &#124; Software Cooperative News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...] couple of weeks ago, I asked why people do and don’t join SPI? The answers I got can be grouped into a few [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couple of weeks ago, I asked why people do and don’t join SPI? The answers I got can be grouped into a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPI 2008 Election Result and Apology &#124; Software Cooperative News</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>SPI 2008 Election Result and Apology &#124; Software Cooperative News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>[...] apology: the summary of responses to my questions about SPI membership will appear next week because I made a mistake on one site, set the closing date a week late and I [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] apology: the summary of responses to my questions about SPI membership will appear next week because I made a mistake on one site, set the closing date a week late and I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghostbar</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>ghostbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>As Clayton said, I&#039;ve been looking a while for how to join, is not the first time, I did before and never found it until now that Clayton said that was part of some submenu that BTW was the only one I didn&#039;t looked for (normally &quot;About&quot; is just a page, not a menu)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Clayton said, I&#8217;ve been looking a while for how to join, is not the first time, I did before and never found it until now that Clayton said that was part of some submenu that BTW was the only one I didn&#8217;t looked for (normally &#8220;About&#8221; is just a page, not a menu)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clayton</title>
		<link>http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.news.software.coop/why-people-do-and-dont-join-spi/14/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>The membership page on the SPI website is buried at the bottom of a secondary menu. One has to really go looking for it. And this definitely gives the impression that adding members is not a very high priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The membership page on the SPI website is buried at the bottom of a secondary menu. One has to really go looking for it. And this definitely gives the impression that adding members is not a very high priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

