I don’t think it will be a surprise to anyone, but Ananova reports: No-one getting top broadband speeds based on the Ofcom/SamKnows/GfK research.
In the village where I live, our “up to 8Mbps” service is stable at about 4. As I mentioned previously, it will go faster, but it will break. Our end of the village is the “good” end. I’ve had reports that the other end of the village struggles to 384kbps. A point-to-point wifi link from the good end would be faster than the copper cables! This situation is incredible.
In general, things are slightly better for cable users – if you buy a 10Mbps service, you may well get 8. The result that really surprised me is “ISPs using ADSL1 who invest in network capacity are able to deliver speeds as good as ADSL2+ operators”. What does that means for where the bottleneck actually is and for all the expense of ADSL2+ equipment for both operators and consumers?
Disclosure: software.coop is an agent for ThePhoneCoop, including ADSL services.
[…] Published The Great British Broadband Speed Lie http://www.news.software.coop/the-great-british-broadband-speed-lie/729/ […]
hehehehe…
Yes, a sad situation.
I’m on aDSL v1, max 8, getting 1.5Mbps in good times.
Not only do you have to cope with this, but my ISP is mainly a web service provider, not an internet service provider as most of the time all the ports outside of HTTP, HTTPS, POP3, IMAP and SMTP are rate limited to 5% of the available bandwidth. An SSH to my servers in the evening is tough.
All this because in most places the aDSL equipment and feed links are owned by BT and rented to the other ISPs.
The over-subscription on the feeds is ridiculous, so instead of investing money on bandwidth and equipment, money is put on rate-limiting infrastructure, or on snail mail warning of terrible usage and other punishment.
The thing is, in most places in the UK, you cannot even exercise your only consumer right to punish the bad ISP, contract cancellation and moving to someone else, as it won;t change a thing, your copper will not even be moved to another piece of equipment and the situation will be the same, with another logo and eventually another name for the “service-enhancing and social equalizing” bandwidth control.
Sad…
I stand corrected, my service got “improved” during my vacation, from 1.5 Mbps to 1 Mbps…
It varies from ISP to ISP – I’m with a more expensive ISP, Andrews & Arnold, and I’m seeing faster speeds from ADSL2+, no throttling.
As far as I can tell, for all the blame heaped on BT Wholesale, they don’t throttle different ports differently. An ISP can choose to spend enough on infrastructure to offer decent unrestricted service, if it thinks it can make up the money in subscriptions; note that I pay £60 pcm for two telephone lines, a bonded pair of ADSL2+ lines, and a VoIP phone number, which is considerably more than I’d pay for broadband and phone from (say) The Phone Coop, as I use around 10GB/month.
BT recently had a televised advert about how their speed was consistent up to 20 MB, and would never drop. Well that is a bloody lie! At best my speed is hitting 5.5 MB, and fluctuates at around 35 – 75 KB when I need it. Ask BT to explain and they don’t want to know.