Three Strikes: Out?

The Guardian reported this week that “rights holders will have to obtain a court order before punishing persistent offenders by reducing or cutting off their internet connections.”

This is an important step in the right direction. For too long, rights holders and their agents have been able to make allegations without fear of repurcussions, even though loss of internet access can be a terrible problem for customers, especially as more government services move online. In the US, we’ve even seen rights holder agents acting against legitimate publishing by TV production companies – these groups really are out of control!

There are still unanswered questions about who pays when an allegation is made, with the cost usually being left with the customer, either directly (through having to pay the ISP an admin fee for the allegation) or indirectly (through higher ISP fees). Hopefully the courts would rule fairly on who should pays the costs in each case.

The next step would be to prohibit things like Karoo’s Three Strikes as unfair terms in consumer contracts.

Posted in ThePhoneCoop | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Final Decision Time: Koha Foundation Options

Thomas Dukleth writes in:

“Remember to vote for your choices in the final Koha foundation forming election before the poll closes on the 25th.

Turnout in the final Koha foundation forming election is lower than in the previous preliminary poll at this point. This is the poll which determines our actual choice. The previous poll was more of a survey to discover interests and inform the process of how to conduct the final election.

The links to the ballot are as follows.

English:
http://opensource.web2learning.net/limesurvey/index.php?sid=88794&lang=en
French:
http://opensource.web2learning.net/limesurvey/index.php?sid=88794&lang=fr

Pages linked from the Koha Wiki foundation forming options page, short link http://bit.ly/4AjYin , and discussions which we have had on the Koha mailing lists should inform you of the options.”

Go vote! In other news, there’s a bugfix release of koha-3.0.4.

Posted in Koha, SPI | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Some Good Does Come From Ubuntu

I’ve been mouthing off about Ubuntu again, after the forthcoming release parties were advertised in some pretty inappropriate places, lamenting:

“Ubuntu has taken a voluntary-sector aim-for-100%-free distribution, built a private-sector free-and-non-free distribution and gets more love and free marketing from free software supporters than its parent, or than the whole-community events.”

However, I did surprise someone by ending with

“The silver lining is that most Ubuntu improvements are free software and are/can be contributed back to the free software world.”

That’s in part because Ubuntu finally made some progress on the Mailman colour mismash bug I tried to fix 5 years ago which is still unfixed in GNU as far as I know.

So I think that as long as much of Ubuntu is free software, its contributors will still be doing some good work. I hope a mailman bgcolor/CSS patch is taken by other distributions soon.

Posted in GNU/Linux | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Royal Mail Rub Our Noses in it

So after Royal Mail shut down useful community websites causing MP comments on the idiocy of Royal Mail, I was rather surprised to get this little thing in the post today:

postcode

That’s a postmark advert for “Celebrating 50 years of POSTCODES 1959-2009”. So this is what Royal Mail does with some of the money it makes from its claimed monopoly on postcode databases: it spends it on ink to celebrate postcodes in the bit where they can’t sell adverts.

After the postcode-takedown, I suggested deleting postcodes from all our co-op’s websites. Instead, another member has persuaded me to contribute to something like free the postcode, which I first saw on CycleStreets blog.

As well as slapping its customers, Royal Mail is also currently taking on its workers who are campaigning for sustainable jobs and against the recent increase in bullying and harassment cases. I already send most of my letters, invoices and so on electronically since our three nearest post offices closed last year.

I’ve noticed Edinburgh Bicycle Co-op switching to DPD and Terry Lane suggesting more online use. Are those good approaches? How are you adapting to the postal delays? Have you put your postcode into free the postcode or a similar site?

Posted in Cooperatives | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Sharing git repositories

Our co-op uses the git revision control system pretty extensively, both directly and through etckeeper. With more workers, we’re keeping more shared copies of our git repositories. So inevitably, we ran into permissions problems.

Thanks a lot to Moser for pointing out the git repo-config core.sharedRepository true option. I’ve also had a bit more of a look around git config (because repo-config is an alias for that) and wonder about the logAllRefUpdates and whitespace settings.

Anyone have favourite values for these or other cooperative git tips?

Posted in GNU/Linux | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

SPI October 2009

A board meeting of Software in the Public Interest will take place on irc.oftc.net #spi tonight (Wed 14 Oct) at 20:00 UTC. The meeting announcement was posted only yesterday, containing a proposal to hold a debian domain.

The proposal says “SPI Inc. will support a transfer of said domain to a registered non-profit organization in Taiwan” which surprises me after the reply I had about Transferring to another non-profit that “I’d say that any transfer to a non-US non-profit is likely to be impossible.”

Oh and what happened to the contributing membership expiry resolution? I thought that was coming back this month.

I see that there wasn’t a SPI September 2009 meeting log summary sent to spi-general, probably because I wasn’t there. I’ll go do that now.

Posted in SPI | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

FOSS Freeskilling, Bristol, 7pm Tue 13 Oct

Sean Kenny emailed us to tell us about an event in Bristol: “This week’s Freeskilling is called Who needs Microsoft? and we are meeting at the Better Food Co. Cafe, St Werburghs @ 7pm Tues 13th Oct. Ben Smith will be giving a talk about how you can replace Microsoft Windows and all the very expensive and security flawed software that goes with it, with Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). This will save you lots of money and is more ethical into the bargain! For more info, go to http://thegurinet.doesntexist.com/

Only thing I’m disappointed about is that it’s centred on replacing Microsoft, but that’s still the starting point for most people.

Posted in Cooperatives | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Koha.org Desires Poll Results

Here are the results of the Koha Foundation Desires poll.

More than 75% of respondants support the Koha foundation/association doing these things:-

1. ensure the ongoing shared governance of the project = 32 out of 35 = 91.43%
2. owning koha.org = 16 out of 18 = 88.89%
3. secure the Koha name = 31 out of 35 = 88.57%
4. Kaitiaki (guardianship) role = 29 out of 35 = 82.86%
5. be owner of the copyright = 27 out of 35 = 77.14%

More than half want to see it do something about each of these six:-

6. user/developer conferences/user group meetings = 24 out of 35 = 68.57%
7. funding non sexy but highly necessary jobs such as revamping and optimising old code = 24 out of 35 = 68.57%
8. networking local associations (such as KUDOS, KohaLA) = 12 out of 18 = 66.67%
9. managed democratically by its member (Association more than Foundation) = 11 out of 18 = 61.11%
10. promote OSS solutions in libraries = 21 out of 35 = 60%
11. further development of features = 19 out of 35 = 54.29%

Less than half want these five tasks:-

12. usability/ accessibilty studies = 16 out of 35 = 45.71%
13. opensearchportal for all koha installs = 12 out of 35 = 34.29%
14. translations/localisation = 10 out of 35 = 28.57%
15. provide open source solutions for all tasks a library does daily = 10 out of 35 = 28.57%
16. back up your library technically. Local company/volunteers would do the rest = 9 out of 35 = 25.71%

Minority activities:-

17. selling an idea to libraries = 6 out of 35 = 17.14%
18. deployment/adoption in developing countries = 5 out of 35 = 14.29%
19. foster new businesses = 4 out of 35 = 11.43%
20. sure up old ones that might be in dire straits = 3 out of 35 = 8.57%

You can see the names given by the voters and who voted for what in the Koha Foundation Desires poll online.

I hope we’ll see the other, wider survey response before the general meeting in a couple of hours. The agenda for it is on wiki.koha.org.

If you’re involved with koha, I hope to see you there!

Posted in Koha | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Betting on British Broadband Bugfixing

High-speed internet links are something that makes FOSS development much easier, but I’m still having reliability problems with my ADSL. A fringe benefit of moving to a more open Linux-based router is that I can see what’s going wrong in more detail. But now I have to gamble nearly two hundred pounds in order to get the service providers to continue trying to find the bug! Sorry for the length, but let me explain how bad broadband in rural England is just now…

Outside the big cities with their cable networks, Company A owns the lines, Company B provides the services and we buy those services from reseller Company C. Sometimes the same company is A and B or B and C, but never all three. Most of the companies who are B won’t be C themselves – in other words, they don’t sell retail, but they nearly always seem to have a main or preferred retail partner.

Company A is nearly always OpenReach, part of BT Group, the telephone monopoly privatised back in the 1980s but still somehow keeping its landline monopoly. Why is that allowed?

Company C has been The Phone Co-op for me for the last few years. Back in February, I changed how I bought my services, combining phone and broadband into one purchase. They’d been two purchases mainly because I switched my ADSL from Pipex to the co-op at a different time to switching my line to them. As I understand it, this change had the side effect of changing Company B from OpenReach to Opal Telecom. Opal are the provider business behind TalkTalk, hardest to use Broadband ISP 2009.

Since the change, I’ve been suffering unexplained disconnections, especially in the early evenings and at weekends. I’m pretty sure it’s Opal’s equipment to blame for two reasons:-

Firstly, this wasn’t happening until Opal became Company B, while Companies A and C are the same as before (when I had a stable but unspectacular 4Mbps connection).

Secondly, since changing my router, I can see LCP TermReq being sent by Opal’s PPP peers. Opal insist their equipment isn’t sending TermReq messages. My Netgear router disagrees, but I can’t seem to get anyone to take its pppd debug logs seriously.

So, I’ve complained to my supplier (Company C), they’ve pretty straightforwardly passed it to Company B and I’ve jumped through all the bloody silly hoops like using only wired connections to the router (yay, wires across the house), plugging the router into different phone sockets (yay, more wires across the house) and disconnecting everything from the phone sockets so Company A can run some voltage test (yay, uncontactability – just as well other software.coop workers can cover for me).

Now the next step is for some phone engineer to call. For this to happen, I have to agree that I will pay GBP 164 if a fault is found on my phone network instead of theirs. If I don’t, they will give up trying to find the fault.

I don’t really see why this is necessary: surely if there was a line fault, it would have shown itself on the old service? Also, the router says the line has no fault and the SNR and Attenuation are both fine but not great. Unlike most people, I’ve already had my house phone network tested with professional equipment (yay for network engineers in the co-op trying to avoid the painful state of British broadband bugfixing), but I’m still left betting hundreds of pounds on the phone engineers not pointing the finger at my network. What choice do I have?

I’ve read elsewhere about people giving up on ADSL and switching to mobile internet because then they have only one company to deal with. I can see some attraction in that, but I live in a village with poor mobile service and I suspect the forthcoming T-Mobile/Orange and T-Mobile/Three link-ups will soon make that less straightforward too. A confusopoly is probably more profitable to telephone companies.

Do most people bet a couple of hundred pounds to get their broadband fixed? How many broadband faults get ignored at that point? Why don’t the retail company Cs have access to enough Company B systems to lead the fault-finding instead of only being able to pass it on to people who seem to give replies that contradict the logs and won’t talk directly to customers? Is fixing this A-B-C three-companies-pass-the-buck system a necessity for Digital Britain? Why isn’t the government intervening to end the OpenReach monopoly outside the big cities?

Posted in Cooperatives, SPI | Comments Off on Betting on British Broadband Bugfixing

Concentration, Community and Cooperation

I read the news about the launch of Ubuntu User by Linux New Media AG with some sadness. I believe that free software is stronger because of the informal cooperation between different distributions that usually do different jobs. It lets us see what’s growing in our neighbour’s garden. I’m a debian developer, but I don’t subscribe to many debian-specific products or services because I like the broader view.

Also, at a generally-economically-weak time when some more general publications seem to be dying and restarting, concentrating on the Ubuntu users seems like it probably won’t be a big enough audience to sustain a title. The temporary loss of readers could also push other multi-distribution magazines over the brink.

Now, I use and support Ubuntu systems from time to time (among others), but it feels like Ubuntu attracts this sort of anti-social single-distribution concentration more often than any other current one. Its users seem even more fixed on it than Gentoo’s users, which is almost the opposite of what I expect from a distribution which claims “Ubuntu and Free Software are about collaboration and working together”.

So why does this happen? Are any sociologists researching whether there are really narrower horizons among Ubuntu users than others? Have any Ubuntu community leaders questioned the lack of collaboration with Free Software in launching an Ubuntu-only magazine in a recession?

Posted in Education, Training and Information | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments