OSI and FSF Licence Approval Comparison

The Open Source Initiative and the Free Software Foundation are probably the two authorities on what is free and open source software that are better respected than the debian project. It’s fairly easy to see that the famous licences (GNU GPL) appear on both lists, but how similar are their approvals?

There was a comparison at Asheeshworld Notes you will like: OSI vs FSF in 2007, but I’ve noticed more and more duplicates in that listing and the source code didn’t work for me. I’ve captured the current differences between their actual approvals in a pseudo-diff. The generating code and intermediate steps are splattered around the same folder.

Many of the differences look like a result of process differences, but I’m not sure because OSI doesn’t make any comments and their licence review process archive seems awkward to search. As I understand it, a lawyer advocates a licence in the OSI process, so it requires the licensor to contribute (and many licensors couldn’t care less about OSI); but FSF does an independent review, so FSF has to decide it’s worth reviewing. In case it’s not obvious, I think FSF’s independent foundation-led review is much the better of those two.

There are two licences that OSI approved but FSF lists as non-free: NASA Open Source Agreement and the Reciprocal Public License. Both of these are “send-back-ware” where changes have to be sent back or made available to the upstream developer. Many debian developers agree such payments-in-kind are non-free (OSI’s OSDefinition is based on the Debian Free Software Guidelines), but I think an early OSI advisor thought they were a good idea, so those approvals look like an OSI bug to me.

It’s not obvious if there are licences that FSF approves but OSI rejects. OSI doesn’t seem to list licences to avoid.

Is it helpful to see the differences? Would a comparison with the debian archive be useful? Are there other curiousities captured in the differences? Are people interested in reconciling the differences?

Posted in SPI | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Three Releases: Debian, Co-op and Videos

Three things I really like have released recently:-

  1. Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (“Lenny”): I installed it on a laptop the weekend before going to a conference and I’m really impressed. It installed fairly neatly and was good-looking (gtk installer from USB stick, default desktop task, in case anyone cares). I found one or two small glitches while travelling, which I’ll reportbug soon, but they’re very minor. Well done to everyone involved in stabilising this release!
  2. The co-operative officially launched its new brand with a 2.5-minute whole-break advert using a Bob Dylan track, both of which are unusual. OK, so I feel it should have been available in a FOSS-friendly format and not done on the same day as announcing a sale of opticians or a big closure, but it’s still good to see the co-operative getting big TV exposure.
  3. Videos of Debian at FOSDEM and the Business of Open Source mini-conference at Linux.conf.au were released, which I’ll watch soon. The current trend of recording key conferences isn’t a substitute for being there in-person, but it’s still invaluable and I thank all those involved.
Posted in Cooperatives, Education, Training and Information, GNU/Linux | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The South West RDA’s Business Stakeholder Conference: Shooting the Economic Rapids

I was at this event back in November and they’ve just emailed me this week to point out the speeches and some recordings are now available online. The appointed Regional Development Agency is getting more powerful as our indirectly-elected South West Regional Assembly is phased out, so if you’re based in SW England, you may find their current views affect a lot of your daily life over the next few years.

After the meeting, I passed on a few comments about how Business Link is failing to support cooperatives and I was asked for numbers, but I don’t think I have them yet. I’m still following this up and will post about it again later.

Posted in Cooperatives | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SPI February 2009

The monthly board meeting of SPI will take place on irc.oftc.net #spi tonight (Wed 11 Feb) at 20:00 UTC. Members may have seen that the meeting announcement came out on time – hooray! It looks like minutes may also catch up to last meeting, too.

There are two new associated project currently under discussion: the Helios Initiative and OpenWRT. I think both of them had been waiting for a legal opinion.

I may still be travelling and without a stable network connection during the meeting, or I might have made it home by then. Either way, watch the comments below this article for a link to the summary when posted.

Posted in SPI | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Voice09 LiveBlog

After a few hiccoughs, I’m trying to gather live coverage of Voice09 in Birmingham today and tomorrow over on the software.coop site. I have access to the wifi, but picture uploads will mostly have to wait until I can bugfix some stuff this evening.

Posted in Cooperatives | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Setting up and sustaining a global FOSS-based business (Ian Lynch)

Another Monday, start of the working week and I’m thinking about business again. Ian Lynch of The Learning Machine is a smart cookie who I’ve collaborated with before. He leads a free-software-based business which is very different from TTLLP’s cooperative model and he gave a talk about it to Manchester Free Software. Here are the headlines:-

Building a FOSS Business
  • No fees from licenses
  • Services allied to FOSS
  • Something everyone needs
  • Low cost to produce
  • Low cost to distribute
  • Encourage FOSS take up
  • Increase the number of FOSS contributors
  • Make money to support FOSS development
Background theory and research
  • Clay Christensen and the theory of disruptive innovation
  • The innovators dilemma
  • Seeing What is Next
Business Growth
  • 3 horizons of business growth
  • Horizon 1 – current profitable business
  • Horizon 2 – business with clear potential
  • Horizon 3 – possibilities currently being explored
  • Pipeline for growth
Tipping points
  • Critical mass
  • Viral effects
The ideal product
  • Something everyone needs
  • Something that costs nothing to make
  • Something that costs nothing to distribute
  • Something that has increasing value the more that is bought.
The INGOTs
  • International Grades – Open Technologies
  • Market disruption
  • Lower barriers to entry
  • Target those currently not in the market
  • Provide products that are good enough
  • Improve and add features over time
Primary Schools – KS3
  • No-one targets primary schools
  • Very little certification in KS3
  • Use specialist schools community plans
  • “Upsell” from primary to secondary
  • KS3 – add value at with less work for teachers
Developing world
  • Enable developing countries into the qualifications market
  • Target those making the transition to FOSS
  • Ally to netbook/smartphone internet access to lower costs
  • Use UK Awarding Body status for credibility.

The above points are under a Creative Commons cc-by-sa license and the original report was at Manchester Free Software. Sometimes FSUK-Manchester produce videos of talks, but I’ve not seen this one yet. Watch their page for details.

What can Ian’s business analysis teach us about free software businesses? What interesting questions does it leave open?

Have you had anything to do with the INGOTs? I’ve not worked in education for a while, so I’d love to hear tales from the chalkface about them.

Posted in Education, Training and Information | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Phone Co-op AGM 2009

Yesterday I phoned into The Phone Co-op AGM 2009 and heard the reports, most of which you can read in the PDF annual report from the AGM website. There were also various questions from members, which I scribbled down as follows:-

What does ADSL mean?
Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line. Essentially, what we sell as broadband.
How many day-equivalents of training did part-time employees get on average? (I think this was the question, but I got a bit lost.)
Information not immediately available. ThePhoneCoop will research and reply later. The number of part-time employees is an asterisk footnote in the non-financial performance indicators.
Where are the Phone Co-op’s investments?
Most of the share capital is for investment in TPC, but surpluses arise for various reasons and are invested outside. Current locations include 40k in long-term investments, including 10k in the Co-operative Group, 20k in Westmill wind farm, 5k in a hydro power project; 60k is in the ICOF share account, 1.4m in the Co-operative Group, […I missed some. I was struggling to keep up. Some of this may be wrong anyway…] 486k in Midcounties Cooperative share account, 20k in Chelmsford Star; total of about 2.9m.
Is ICOF deciding recipients of the sustainability fund or The Phone Co-op?
The arrangement with ICOF is now ending for various reasons and now TPC will partner with Black Country Reinvestment Society. Don’t want to manage the fund directly because it’s not a core task for a phone company.
The increase in turnover is described as mainly to existing customers. Has there been an increase in the number of customers?
The Phone Co-op is recruiting 150-200pcm residential and 30 business customers, but losing a similar number. Have recruited new staff to try to improve this.
Is share account interest being cut in line with banking interest?
Just cut to 3%, but there has been a net inflow of investment. Current interest receipts from TPC cover it due to long-term investments, but they will mature, so the interest rate will be cut gradually to keep it sustainable.
Purchase from other cooperatives is 11% and falling. What is being done to increase it?
[I missed the answer to this.]
What is happening about getting a new office?
The Phone Co-op still has an option on a site in Chipping Norton, but no planning permission. An alternative commercial building which was being discussed with its owner was lost to housing (planning permission granted there!). There is a general lack of suitable sites available and things are happening cautiously in the current climate.
If we’re trying to save paper, why did members receive two envelopes in the post for this AGM?
The report was sent from Calverts directly, to save time, postage, staff and “report miles”
Is the description of “non-white” in the performance indicators a problem for mixed white+non-white people?
Will look into this.
How many affinity schemes are there?
There are currently 300 and they are being reviewed for the best way to work better with them.
Are acquisitions likely?
Expect the credit crisis to being opportunities. There are benefits from more traffic and so on. TPC has been contacting potential suppliers and intermediaries asking after other providers in difficulties.
What is the deferred income shown in the financial statements?
Pre-billed broadband and similar products.
Is the investment in the Co-operative Group risky?
TCG holds around 4bn in assets under and is one of the longest continuously-traded companies in the UK.
Are ThePhoneCo-op’s 0845 numbers advantageous to TPC or the caller?
Still yes for TPC, paying 1p/min at peak; probably not advantageous to caller these days.
There are 15% sales to cooperatives shown. What’s the largest cooperative and what % of that is it?
Shown in the annual report. [The numbers in report work out to about 15% of all sales I think. So, nearly all sales to cooperatives are sales to Midcounties?]

All errors and omissions in the above are mine.

I heard the allocation approved, then I had to leave before the special meeting and the presentations. If anyone has links to them or coverage, please leave me a comment. Other comments welcome, too.

Posted in ThePhoneCoop | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Top 8 J2ME MIDP Applications

Well, in line with the Do Not Drive from the local police (and one from Gloucestershire), I’ll be phoning in to ThePhoneCoop AGM today and doing a bit of work from home.

While preparing for the journey that never was, I realised that I’ve mentioned some of these phone tools in articles like Connecting from the k608i with SSL, but not all of them. So, here’s my favourite Java phone applications:-

  1. MidpSSH: this is my main workhorse, as long as I have a stable data connection (even 3G seems to freak sometimes above 120mph). I’ll be connected to a screen session in our server (TERM=linux) using lynx, irssi, mailx and other tools I learnt back at UEA;
  2. MujMail: if I don’t have a stable network connection, this seems a good way to download email from SSL in bursts for offline reading;
  3. Mobile RSS Reader: downloads RSS in bursts for offline reading;
  4. anyRemote: this is my main workhourse at home, replacing the above three applications. My phone doesn’t do WiFi, so I use bluetooth to run shell commands on my workstation, read RSS feeds and email and view web pages. Combined with a video-sender, it also acts as a remote control when playing internet video feeds on the TV. At a push, it can control the workstation’s full GUI, but that’s a bit slow and awkward;
  5. JabberMixClient: I’m having a few problems controlling this in version 2, but 1.x uses the basic GUI and works mostly fine. I guess I ought to fix its bugs, but I’m terrible at Java;
  6. MicroCalc2: a cool lisp-driven spreadsheet, handy for sums you want to keep and it went GPL about two years ago;
  7. ReadManiac: much better than the built-in browser for text files and went GPL about a year ago. If only I could work out how to sign it with my local TTLLP certificate authority and get rid of the security prompts;
  8. MFRadio: useful when the built-in FM RDS radio can’t find anything interesting. The interface is a bit clunky and it really racks up data transfer charges, but it seems worth keeping around.

All of those are free and open source software, mostly under the GNU GPL. The only thing I feel I’m really missing now is a free and open source FTP client, for uploading photos to my preferred photo-sharing site. Any suggestions?

Posted in ThePhoneCoop | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Phone Co-op Workshop AGM and Voice09

On Saturday (7 February), I should be attending both The Phone Co-op AGM and The Phone Co-op Members’ Workshop before it. I’ll be asking a question at the AGM, if we can get the wording nailed down in time.

Sadly, travel from Bristol to Chipping Norton by train is totally screwed by engineering works near Didcot and the usual poor connections from the cross-country line, so I’ll be making a 2 hour car journey instead of a 5 hour train+bus combination. If you’re travelling from the Bristol area and can car-share, please get in touch.

Next Tuesday/Wednesday is Voice09 in Birmingham and I should be there if things come together in time. This is the Social Enterprise Coalition’s annual conference. Conservative Party leader David Cameron MP will open as keynote speaker, with Liam Byrne MP, Minister for the Cabinet Office, opening on Wednesday. Would live-blogging or similar be interesting to people reading this?

If you’d like to meet up at either event, get in touch somehow – comments here, instant message, email, or phone. If you’ve something you’d like to send to either, also get in touch.

Posted in ThePhoneCoop | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Reject the Term Extension Directive

One of the most frustrating things about Copyright Expansion is that it’s being driven through at international levels, far away from most of the people that it affects. When we try to contact our international representatives, such as national government ministers or officers, or Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), it usually takes me at least two attempts to convince them that I actually understand the issue that I fell they’re about to bodge.

So, here we go again:-

“The European Parliament is being asked to nearly double the term of copyright afforded to sound recordings. Industry lobbyists suggest that extending copyright term will help increase the welfare of performers and session musicians. But the Term Extension Directive, which will be voted on by the Legal Affairs Committee in a few weeks’ time, will do no such thing.”

Follow developments on EDRI’s Copyright page and Write to your MEP, like Stuart Langridge did. I’ll contact Neil Parish MEP directly and hopefully he’ll remember me, so I won’t have to do that “stop sending me copy-pasta from Malcolm Harbour” dance. I’ll also see if I can get nice responses out of the other parties this time.

Posted in SPI | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment